THE SPEECH ACT OF INSULTS: FORESIC AND HEURISTIC LINGUISTIC STUDY

TINDAK TUTUR PENGHINAAN: KAJIAN LINGUISTIK FORESIK DAN HEURISTIK

Authors

  • Charles Butar-butar UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH SUMATERA UTARA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37755/sjip.v11i1.1745

Keywords:

forensic linguistics, speech acts, defamation

Abstract

This study investigates one of the cases of insults taken from defamation that occurred in 2021, a case involving RI, which has now reached the trial stage in court. SH was charged with defamation on RI's Facebook account using the terms "Flakor always in front.... beautiful but unfortunately Salome and What's good about using the loot". This study is classified as descriptive qualitative. The post on RI's account has been reported with the Police Report number LP/118/I/2021RES-LB/POLDASU, which will later be used as a source of research in the study. Based on Law Number 1 of 2024, Articles 27A and 27 B, whether it can be considered a defamatory speech or not. The researcher proved SH's speech using speech act theory, speech context, and discourse analysis. SH's speech can be stated as making insulting speech in the form of accusing, mocking and criticizing because it meets every element mentioned in the law.  

References

Aljarah et al. (2021). P8, Detection of hate speech embedded in Arabic tweets. Racial, Religious, Misogyny hate speech.National Institute of Health.

Arikunto, Suharsimi.(2022). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktek,.Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta..

Barda Nawawi Arief, Iqbal Kamalludin. (2019).SARAN Adapun saran yang “’Kebijakan Formulasi Hukum Pidana Tentang Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Penyebaran Ujaran Kebencian (Hate Speech) di Dunia Maya.” LAW REFORM 15, no. 1 ): 113–129.

Butar. C. 2024. Tindak Tutur Pencemaran Nama Baik ( Suatu Kajian Linguistik Foresik ) Jurnal Serunai Ilmu Pendidikan Vol.10 No.2, Desember2024. https://ejournal.stkipbudidaya.ac.id/index.php/ja/about

Celli, F., Lai, M., Duzha, A., Bosco, C., & Patti, V. (2021). Policycorpus XL: An Italian Corpus for the Detection of Hate Speech Against Politics. CLiC-It.

Chaer, A. (2010). Kesantunan Berbahasa. Rineka Cipta.

Chazawi, Adami.(2013). Hukum pidana positif penghinaan.Malang: Bayumedia Publishing.

Correa, M. Linguistik Forensik: Tinjauan Umum tentang Persinggungan dan Interaksi Bahasa dan Hukum.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/314426867_Forensic_Linguistics_An_Overview_of_the_Intersection_and_Interaction_of_Language_and_Law

Febriyani, Meri. (2008).Analisis Faktor Penyebab Pelaku Melakukan Ujaran Kebencian (Hate Sanyoto, Sanyoto. “PENEGAKAN HUKUM DI INDONESIA. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum 8, no. 3 (2008): 199–204.

Herawati, Dewin Maria.(2016).Penyebaran Hoax Dan Hate Speech Sebagai Representasi Kebebasan Berpendapat. Promedia 2, no. 2 : 138–155.

Hinduja, S., & Patchin, J. W. (2018). Cyberbullying: Identification, prevention, and response. Cyberbullying Research Center.

https://portalkudus.pikiran-rakyat.com/lifestyle/pr-796762913/arti-salome-dalam-bahasa-gaul-simak-penjelasan-apa-itu-salome-di-tik-tok-istilah-bahasa-gaul-viral?page=all

Indonesia. (1946). Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP). Jakarta: Sekretariat Negara.

Indonesia. (2008). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik. Jakarta: Sekretariat Negara

Indonesia. (2016). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik. Jakarta: Sekretariat Negar

Indonesia. (2023). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Sekretariat Negara.

KBBI online. https://kbbi.kemdikbud.go.id/

Laporan Polisi LP/118/I/2021RES-LB/POLDASU

Leech, Geoffrey. 1993. Prinsip-prinsip Dasar Pragmatik. Jakarta: Penerbit Universitas Indonesia Press.

Maurati, D. (2018). Dampak sosial media terhadap bisnis online dan tindakan negatif.

Moeloeng, Lexi. J.(2001). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung,:Remaja Rosda Karya.

Ningrum, P. (2018). Media Sosial dan Perilaku Remaja: Tantangan dan Solusi. Yogyakarta: Deepublish.

Raharjo.(2002). A. Cyber Crime pemahaman dan upaya pencegahan kejahatan berteknologi, Bandung: PT Citra Aditya Bakti.

Rahmawati, Novi.(2017). ‘Implikasi Perubahan UndangUndang Informasi Dan Transaksi Elektronik Terhadap Tindak Pidana Ujaran Kebencian (Hate Speech).’ Jurnal Mahupiki 1, no. 1 : 1–21.

Republik Indonesia, 2016. Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Terhadap Tindak Pidana Ujaran Kebencian di Median Sosial. Jurnal Kertha Wicara 7, no. 3 (2018): 1–15.

Undang.Undang Republik Indonesi.A Nomor 1 Tahun 2024 Tentang Perubahan Kedua Atas Undang-Undang Nomor I1 Tahun 2oo8 Tentang Informasi Dan Transaksi Elektronik

Wijana, I. D. P., & Rohmadi, M. (2010). Analisis Wacana Pragmatik Penelitian Teori dan Analisis. Yuma Pustaka.

Downloads

Published

2025-07-25

How to Cite

Butar-butar, C. (2025). THE SPEECH ACT OF INSULTS: FORESIC AND HEURISTIC LINGUISTIC STUDY: TINDAK TUTUR PENGHINAAN: KAJIAN LINGUISTIK FORESIK DAN HEURISTIK . Serunai : Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.37755/sjip.v11i1.1745